|
Post by Batman666 on Mar 27, 2015 12:15:47 GMT
In case any wrestling fan hasn't seen this yet, it's a must see!
|
|
|
Post by joemontana16 on Mar 27, 2015 22:04:37 GMT
This is the first time we are in "Wrestlemania Season" and I don't care for the product. There is very little at the moment that interest me. This is otherwise the best part of the year and the time when they usually get their sheit together but I'm just not feeling it this time as I use to otherwise. Year after year WWE to me gets worse and worse... Like Triple H and Steph operate more and more of the tv shows , PPVs , personal etc. without any input from Vince
Vince never wanted Undertaker to lose at W-Mania,, look at his win streak
Then HHH runs things full time and says let us have Brock beat Taker -- If I am right about this .. It means Taker will lose to Bray Wyatt at this years WrestleMania..
That will be the new way to build up hype for these new crap guys. "Who can beat Taker"
|
|
|
Post by Batman666 on Mar 28, 2015 9:05:46 GMT
HHH & Steph haven't taken over fully yet. The blame still lies on Vince as it's mostly his fault the product is so bad when he constantly changes his mind on a whim and wants last minute re-writes that makes any long time planning go to hell. Thus nobody gets over and we are stuck on what feels like re-runs of the same angles and feuds.
It was actually Vince himself that called for Brock to take the streak last year. So again, the blame lies on his feet there too.
For what it's worth, I think Taker is winning tomorrow against Wyatt.
And thank non-deity for Brock Lesnar, him signing a new contract gave at least me some interest in the Main Event. Would be great if he would retain but I would settle for a double turn with Heel Roman and Heyman.
|
|
|
Post by ShadowAngel on Mar 30, 2015 16:11:24 GMT
HHH & Steph haven't taken over fully yet. I always said: Why would it change anything if those 2 take over? Stephanie is just like Vince, she learned from him and acts as a carbon-copy of him. The best proof was around 2002-2003 when Paul Heyman was the Head-Booker of Smackdown, which led to Smackdown being more popular, putting out a better product, producing bigger names and being just awesome all around: Stephanie worked hard to get Heyman fired, she sadly succeeded. Triple H might be a bit more "old school" and wrestling orientated but how much as he really to say? He does NXT which is like the F-Show of the WWE, nobody gives a rubber duck, they have that show to calm the IWC for the Network but if Vince steps down, Stephanie takes over and has the rule, Triple H will be just her puppy because he knows very well that it only takes a divorce for him to have nothing. Wrestlemania yesterday was a clusterfuck of horrible booking and it boggles my mind that people call it awesome: - Orton beats Rollins, who wents on to win the Championship Belt. That should be a big No, you can't put over a guy who lost before, winning the biggest title. It's obvious WWE only did that because they knew the crowd (which acted really awesome yesterday, i mean the Rock IV chant and everything) would faeces all over Reigns winning or Lesnar retaining. - Sting loses...no words for that. Also Sting - Undertaker next year will be "WM losers battling it out". Just horrible. - Cena beats Rusev. USA USA #1 i guess but stupid. Cena winning a midcard title makes no sense. Cena doesn't need it. Rusev should've gone over here in a big way - Big Show wins a Battle Royale that should give a push for a younger guy. I guess it makes 'sense', since Big Show is Andre's son (Don't look weird, look up WCW History) If you guys haven't seen it:
|
|
|
Post by Batman666 on Apr 1, 2015 0:58:06 GMT
lol@trailer
You make a lot of good points, but I still enjoyed the show mostly because I loved the main event. And of course, it helps that I didn't have high expectations going in.
|
|
|
Post by joemontana16 on Apr 7, 2015 21:33:26 GMT
Did the old 50 year olds in DX have to come down and fight the 60 year olds of NWO... We wanted to see that 20 years ago! Not at WM31. OMG
|
|
|
Post by Congslop on Apr 10, 2015 2:46:22 GMT
WCW and ECW were bought, then WWF/E stopped caring and so did I. Then it became a kids program again and At age 33 Im too old too watch. But before that it was my religion.
|
|
|
Post by joemontana16 on Apr 11, 2015 0:00:11 GMT
Undertaker Kevin Nash and Big Show were my favorite wrestlers... Taker Tombstones , Jacknife Powerbombs from Nash , and huge Chokeslams from Show! Those were some great years that will never happen again... Even Big Show has maybe 5 years at max before he retires too
|
|
|
Post by ShadowAngel on Apr 13, 2015 22:01:03 GMT
Did the old 50 year olds in DX have to come down and fight the 60 year olds of NWO... We wanted to see that 20 years ago! Not at WM31. OMG They should've done that in 2002/03 at the Survivor Series: Imagine it: Hogan, Hall, Nash, Giant vs. HHH, HBK, Road Dogg and Billy Gunn (and of course it should've been a blinking War Games match!) Even leading up to this event, you could have your weekly drama between all those guys and of course, to quote Bobby Heenan in his biggest blunder: "Who's side is he on?" regarding Sean Waltman, since he was in both groups and could be seen as a turncoat/mole/weasel from both groups leading to a storyline in itself. Even Big Show has maybe 5 years at max before he retires too FIVE more years? Big Show has been stale bread since 5 years and hasn't been done anything worthwhile in a long time (and recently watching some 1995/96 WCW stuff: Holy faeces was he amazing back then, fit and thin, he really was like Andre in his prime and nowadays he is like Andre just without the crutches but equally slow)
|
|
|
Post by Congslop on May 9, 2015 6:33:59 GMT
Remember when they sort of pretended it was a sport? I miss that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2015 9:05:59 GMT
At the moment, I am not very interested in wrestling (sadly). I love this sport, but today´s WWE sucks and I stopped watching TNA for a long time now. I am very interested in Shimmer and Shine and can´t wait for the first episode of Double J´s Global Force Wrestling. Not even interested in Chikara They lost so many important people (Claudio Castagnoli, Sara del Rey, guest star El Generico and Quack too because of his injury). So I really hope that GFW will be awesome!
|
|
|
Post by gallos_11 on Jun 9, 2015 15:48:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ShadowAngel on Jun 10, 2015 14:41:00 GMT
Hmm, lots of mistakes, lots of games that don't get mentioned. Saying that WWF Super Wrestlemania is the first 16-Bit Wrestling game when many where released before (Wrestle War, Cutie Suzuki no Ringside Angel on the Mega Drive for example) and wtf happened in Part 3? How does one think WCW Mayhem was released in 1997? It came out in August 1999. Also saying it's the best of the "few" Electronic Arts wrestling games (there are only 2 and i wouldn't call WCW Backstage Assault a true wrestling game) Also "This game was going to be the first among the story-based wrestling games", the first one with a true story mode was Fire Pro Wrestlig Special for the Super Famicom back in 1994. "The most successful third party title of this time period had to be WWF WrestleMania 2000" - No, that would be WWF No Mercy which topped it's predecessor in every way and there's a reason everybody only talks about No Mercy nowadays. "Unfortunately, these WWF wrestling games were buggy and lax". What? When WWF Warzone was announced (as "WWF 97" originally), everybody went crazy. It was only later and when WWF Attitude came out that people start to say the controls are crap because the AKI games were so much better. I actually have to write a comment on that website. What clueless idiot wrote this article? Edit: Nice, they simply deleted my comments (i wasn't even aggressive, i simply listed all the mistakes they made and there were a lot), what a nice website!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2015 23:51:22 GMT
Edit: Nice, they simply deleted my comments (i wasn't even aggressive, i simply listed all the mistakes they made and there were a lot), what a nice website! What an unprofessional behaviour. Their site is not only an information platform, but a communication platform as well. Clear rules are always important, but with a clear structure. This is a good example to see people who don´t care about anything: Neither their own articles nor what other people think. Awful.
|
|
|
Post by Batman666 on Jun 12, 2015 7:39:42 GMT
Censorship and egos go hand in hand.
|
|