dezanuebe
Sonic the Hedgehog
Master System, the best of all times...
Posts: 2,177
|
Post by dezanuebe on Aug 8, 2005 20:55:56 GMT
I like the wimbledon review i really do, and i like wimbledon, alogside Asterix it was one of the first games i ever bought for my SMS. But i can´t agree with such a high pontuation, i don´t consider the game great, mybe good, and i do believe wimbledon 2 is much better. What do you guys think???
|
|
|
Post by Sinistral on Aug 8, 2005 23:53:23 GMT
Personally I don't really rate the series at all, but I'm not much of a tennis fan. I've only played the two games you mentioned a couple of times, and I can't really remember the key differences from one and the other.
|
|
dezanuebe
Sonic the Hedgehog
Master System, the best of all times...
Posts: 2,177
|
Post by dezanuebe on Aug 9, 2005 16:37:30 GMT
well, a major diference between the two is that we can change the speed of the game in wimbledon 2, that makes it easier to play.
|
|
|
Post by ian on Sept 21, 2005 17:55:49 GMT
Hi. If you're referring to my review, thanks. Glad you liked it. I really love this game. I remember playing and enjoying it in my childhood and then coming back to it in recent years and enjoying just as much. I suppose from a neutral point of view the score I gave it may be a bit high, you could probably take some off for the 'Graphics' and 'Replay value'. I still prefer this over Wimbledon II though. I found when playing Wimbledon II it's harder to hit the ball and was akward because it's so much slower (at first) than the original. I suppose my high scores are due to my tendencies to be as positive about games as I can, especially SMS ones. You'll find with the few reviews that I have written, I rated the games quite highly. Anyway, thanks again. ;D
|
|